Breaking: Roy Moore’s Accuser Admits She Forged Yearbook, Just Days Before AL Election (Video)

From the beginning, the yearbook signature that was propped up by the media as damning evidence that Roy Moore is a pedophile seemed fishy. Different color ink. Inconsistencies with the signature. The “DA” label even though Roy Moore wasn’t D.A. at the time. The fact Gloria Allred refused to let an expert look at it.  It didn’t add up.

On Friday, the story completely blew up.

The great John Nolte has the details.

From Breitbart:

Beverly Young Nelson has finally admitted that she forged a portion of the infamous high school yearbook that she and attorney Gloria Allred used as proof of her accusations against U.S. Senate candidate Roy Moore.

And in yet another blow to the credibility of ABC News, the disgraced, left-wing network downplayed the bombshell by presenting this admission of forgery as adding “notes” to the inscription.

And then, after a woman admits to forging a document used in a campaign to destroy the Republican nominee for the U.S. Senate in Alabama, ABC News quickly moves on as though it is not news of extraordinary consequence.

This is huge.

The rest of Nolte’s piece explains the many, many inconsistencies with the allegations but this revelation makes it abundantly clear that this yearbook signature was forged. She admitted to messing with it. That’s pretty much all the evidence we need.

Here is more from Nolte.

With Nelson now thoroughly discredited, this leaves two accusers against Moore.

One is Leigh Corfman, who claims Moore molested her as a 14 year-old child. She is the most credible of the three, but the narrative behind her story, that Moore’s abuse resulted in Corfman living a troubled life of “drinking, drugs, boyfriends, and a suicide attempt,” is directly contradicted by contemporaneous court records.

Moore’s final accuser is Tina Johnson, a woman who claims Moore groped her butt in his office in 1991. But again, as was the case with Corfman and Nelson, the left-wing media outlets reporting these allegations (The Washington Post, either failed to fully vet the accusers or withheld crucial context.

This media narrative is crumbling fast.

Are we really supposed to believe that these allegations just magically appeared out of nowhere from 40 years ago right before the election as a total coincidence?  Roy Moore has been around for decades and no one brought this up. All of a sudden, right before the election, he’s a monster? You really have to suspend disbelief to buy this story. Yes, if he did those things with a 14-year-old he’s a bad guy. But, it’s not even remotely a fact he did that.

So many of these allegations against Moore have been exposed as just ridiculous. Remember when everyone was running around saying Moore was banned from a mall as if that was a fact? It wasn’t a fact and it now actually looks false.

Joel Pollak wrote a great piece about how the allegations against Moore arent’ adding up. Why does only Breitbart seem to care about the truth here? Why are so many people willing to just believe whatever the mainstream media tells them on this?
[Note: This post was written by Andrew Mark Miller]